purejuice: (Default)
purejuice ([personal profile] purejuice) wrote2010-02-28 03:53 pm

Tanenhaus! You Peckerwood! Cover 'Em Up If You Got 'Em, 'Cause Us Ivy League Bitches Is Packin' Now!

I love New York City better than life itself, actually, but the newspapers -- my life's work -- can be so head up ass sometimes, and on the very same problems, for decades, I do despair of human nature.

Sam Tanenhaus' remarkably cretinous essay on how Hollywood and Karen Finley didn't predict the Amy Bishop massacres. He's the editor of the NYT book review and his cultural references are schlock movies????

My response:

this is a curiously anaerobic piece of logic which conforms to what i call the charlotte fedders syndrome: it's not news until it happens to a white girl.

the essential question here is the same one that got bishop off the hook when she shot her brother 20 years ago and refused to drop the shotgun when ordered to do so by the second of two policemen. a woman of color or a man in those shoes? would have been dead by now. or in jail for fratricide.

what has captured mr. tanenbaum's attention is the whiteness of the criminal. which is all too typically provincial of male supremacist newspapers.

two words: khieu ponnary.

and consider the cases of the child soldiers of the khmer rouge and everywhere else in the world, including your local gangsters: give a child a gun and he becomes a killer. imagine that.


I called him Tanenbaum.

So shoot me. You know where to find me.

[identity profile] the-sikh-geek.livejournal.com 2010-02-28 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Before the end of the second paragraph I hit this speedbump:

"And the alienated teenager, that fixture of modern American life, didn’t fully exist until J. D. Salinger, with his faultless ear and attentive eye, coaxed him into being."

No need to read further.

Except I went to this line:

"or Bruce E. Ivins, the Army biodefense expert who, the F.B.I. concluded last week, committed anthrax terror in the aftermath of 9/11"

Yep, the FBI certainly had a slam dunk of a case with that one, conveniently convicting a dead man with scant proof well after the fact.

[identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com 2010-02-28 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
WHY DO THE WICKED PROSPER???????????????

[identity profile] fengi.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
So very awesome and I totally hadn't thought of this.

[identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
he seems shockingly clueless. he must be sleeping with the boss.

[identity profile] panjianlien.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
I will note, apropos of everything, that Albert "Tick Tock" Tanenbaum was a hit man for Murder, Inc., in the 1930s.

[identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
i should hope he had a defter touch than this pisher.

[identity profile] panjianlien.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
I understand that he was a knife man by preference. Very dextrous.

[identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
i love me a dextrous man.

What the hell was in the NYT's coffee?

[identity profile] fengi.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
In the very same edition we get this article (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/28/t-magazine/28talk-women.html) reassuring us that the Whitney Biennial has no angry feminist artists like Barbara Krueger.

Re: What the hell was in the NYT's coffee?

[identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
there is a groupthink of a certain kind among newspapers and also at the NYT, or among new yorkers. i think they may be drinking the do-me feminists kool aid.

[identity profile] villagecharm.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
If I read it right, he's somehow holding it against artists that they didn't see this coming. That seems like an odd complaint. Surely Amy Bishop's husband might have seen it coming, but Karen Finley?

[identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 12:27 pm (UTC)(link)
it is an odd and ill thought through, and perhaps also an oblique, complaint. the essence of it is, finley and other "feminist" artists play the victim and never the perp. which is fair, i think. on the other hand, who wants perp art? unless you consider that the entire canon is, as can be persuasively argued, perp art? as [personal profile] fengi has recently pointed out, by linking to an interesting piece (http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/film_salon/2010/02/24/bigelow/), which argues that that woman movie director up for the oscar this year, what's her name, is succeeding basically by being an uncle tom and making the most macho perp art.
Edited 2010-03-01 12:32 (UTC)

[identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 12:51 pm (UTC)(link)
he's also saying that the zeitgeist of violence by women, or the empowerment of women represented by their parity (which he thinks has been achieved by bishop????) should have been reflected in popular or low art. i'm not at expert at that, but i'd say wonder woman et al, plus rocker chicks, plus in the fine arts painters and sculptors of my and previous generations (bourgeois, the polish sculptor magdalena whose last name i can never spell, abakanowicz? mostly remarkably the painter of newborn babies...whose name i'm not remembering, and other late 20thc reconsiderations of "beauty" and the male gaze. indeed that whole show of high art, for which i'll get the url, was addressing the issue of "beauty" as a perp criterion. there's the young black woman who does silhouette paper cut art of lynchings, and the whole idea that non-perp art has to address victimization even in precepts of "beauty" is something that tanenhaus, in a remarkably philistine display, doesn't come close to addressing. art is addressing the problem, high and low, perhaps in terms too subtle for A MAJOR ARTS EDITOR to understand? yow.
marlene dumas is the high art painter who is doing violence in the flesh or decay, fascinating.
Regarding Beauty (http://www.amazon.com/Regarding-Beauty-View-Twentieth-Century/dp/3893227792) is the name of the show which addressed perp art as "male gaze", incredibly touching and humane and full of hope.
Edited 2010-03-01 12:58 (UTC)

[identity profile] minniethemoocha.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Silhouette lady: Kara Walker. And she rocks.

[identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
she does, not least by avoiding the feminist performance art trope of damaging your own [lily white anorexic] body. no need for a black woman to put her body on the line. again. good choice, ms. walker.

dumas and one of her baby paintings

[identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Image

[identity profile] orso-amoroso.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)
NYT had some schlock thing on Jeff Bridges, someone facebooked the line about "Lebowski was his Raging Bull".

I was all "wtf?!". It was shit. I couldn't read it.

[identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com 2010-03-01 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
hmmm. is there a new arts editor at the times who is commissioning really stupid stuff???