Feb. 28th, 2010

purejuice: (Default)
I love New York City better than life itself, actually, but the newspapers -- my life's work -- can be so head up ass sometimes, and on the very same problems, for decades, I do despair of human nature.

Sam Tanenhaus' remarkably cretinous essay on how Hollywood and Karen Finley didn't predict the Amy Bishop massacres. He's the editor of the NYT book review and his cultural references are schlock movies????

My response:

this is a curiously anaerobic piece of logic which conforms to what i call the charlotte fedders syndrome: it's not news until it happens to a white girl.

the essential question here is the same one that got bishop off the hook when she shot her brother 20 years ago and refused to drop the shotgun when ordered to do so by the second of two policemen. a woman of color or a man in those shoes? would have been dead by now. or in jail for fratricide.

what has captured mr. tanenbaum's attention is the whiteness of the criminal. which is all too typically provincial of male supremacist newspapers.

two words: khieu ponnary.

and consider the cases of the child soldiers of the khmer rouge and everywhere else in the world, including your local gangsters: give a child a gun and he becomes a killer. imagine that.


I called him Tanenbaum.

So shoot me. You know where to find me.
purejuice: (Default)
Since she outed herself, Belle de Jour has become a bore. She used to write about her private life, whether as callgirl or anon with a kind of deadpan humor. Now she doesn't. She writes about boring things without deadpan humor, but with her curious Story of O-ish acedia? Clinical detachment? It's the perfect tone for writing about going to bed with strangers for money, and noticing the hairbrush, with his wife's hair in it, in the dog's bathroom. But that was long ago, and in another country, and the wench is dead. Now she promotes, like the level-headed little businesswoman she always has been, her gigs elsewhere, writing in her famous blog, completely without the sort of compelling detail she was willing to bogart from her clients.

The latest is she wrote something, along the lines of her almost deadly romance advice, for one of those humor venues that they find hilarious and which leaves the rest of us just gaping. Adventures in Menstruation is the title of the zineish thing. Are you laughing yet?

I think it's a ripoff of some kind of bayish zineish Seal Press endeavor of 15 years ago, when menstruating was hip? Are you laughing? Are you shocked and all giggly to the very toes of your Doc Martens?

I was brought up by women who made no big deal out of it. It doesn't hurt. And if it does, you need to learn to play while injured. You don't get bitch privileges once a month. You must take gym, go swimming, go to work, behave decently, whatevs. You don't get to pussywhip people from the age of 45 to 55 -- or at least not on account of your hormones. Are you laughing? Are you shocked to the very toes of your Doc Martens? Are you willing to give up your schlocky pelvic politics, in the immortal words of Florence King? I think the idea that it's funny is based on the privilege of menstrual exceptionalism. You think it's funny if they taught you it was something nasty you could goldbrick with and evade your conjugals or at least punish hubs with. Are you laughing yet?

My. eyes. glaze. over.

I say this as a person who has been rendered helpless with laughter, gasping on the floor of a movie house 20 minutes after everybody else has stopped laughing, by a fart joke. It's not a matter of sophistication.

Adventures in Menstruation, my ass. Get a job, bitches. Every day of the month. Bwahahahahahaha!

Profile

purejuice: (Default)
purejuice

January 2012

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 01:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios