Reporters Love to Be Cassandraesque....
Feb. 7th, 2010 08:21 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...but this is ominous. Only people who are fanatical readers of newspapers are aware that TV pretty much rips all its reporting off from newspapers. It doesn't, in short, do any reporting that could pass ethically, enterprise-wise, or editorially for same at the schlockiest newspaper in the world. And when the NYT stops reporting, there will be no news that is not driven by TV's imperative of 40 per cent profit margins. Think of the news as an endless loop of the alarmist shit broadcast from 4 to 6:30 on your local news every day. Car crashes. Pedophiles. Germs on telephones. Back-to-the-bunker stories which have created, in my opinion, the new generation of freaked-out moms. And suburbs without yards because, well, you know, there are pedophiles outside. That's the news.
On the other hand, Twits may just be too dumb to commmunicate their news.
A friend at the Times recently said he doubts that in five years there will be a print edition of the paper, except maybe on Sundays. Once the print New York Times is extinct, it’s not at all clear how the paper will pay for its primary job, which is reporting. Any journalist who cheerleads uncritically for Twitter is essentially asking for his own destruction.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/georgepacker/2010/02/neither-luddite-nor-biltonite.html#ixzz0erajnsHX
On the other hand, Twits may just be too dumb to commmunicate their news.
A friend at the Times recently said he doubts that in five years there will be a print edition of the paper, except maybe on Sundays. Once the print New York Times is extinct, it’s not at all clear how the paper will pay for its primary job, which is reporting. Any journalist who cheerleads uncritically for Twitter is essentially asking for his own destruction.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/georgepacker/2010/02/neither-luddite-nor-biltonite.html#ixzz0erajnsHX
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 09:46 pm (UTC)The big irony, of course, is that statistically all the major violent crimes are WAY down, to the lowest points they've been at in decades. That, and the big boogey-man fears that people carry around (child abduction, home invasion, etc.) are so statistically small as to not even really exist, at least as far as scary strangers *out there* are concerned. One certainty though is that raising a child to not take the slightest risks and to grow up normalized to being joined at Mommy's hip will create a dependent, easily cracked pseudo-adult.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-08 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 07:41 pm (UTC)Beyond sad. And dangerous.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 09:20 pm (UTC)i don't think newspapers will go away. i think politico is the new business model (http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/02/politicos_business_model.asp), and i wish i knew more about it. i think it's doing well, and i'd like to know if more of its advertising comes from the website or the paper version. i think the sites can be made to support the paper versions.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-08 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-08 12:42 am (UTC)