Tea Party

Apr. 15th, 2010 08:03 am
purejuice: (Default)
[personal profile] purejuice
The Tea Partiers are not, as I deduced from a previous NYT story, boomers out of work. There's a new NYT poll which explains who they are.

I am ready to consign them to the scrapheap of history I shall dub The Racist Backlash Against the 1965 Voting Rights Act That LBJ Said Would Last 50 Years. Five years to go. Buh-bye.

I must say, I think the blogosphere pundits' Gotcha, argue with every word uttered by every asshole on the planet, attitude, is counterproductive. Ignore them, deprive them of a venue, do not repeat or listen to what they say, and they will go away.

Date: 2010-04-16 02:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] villagecharm.livejournal.com
I am reminded of the speaker at the Tea Party rally I attended today who cited a Newsweek poll claiming that 25 percent of Americans are sympathetic to the movement.

"So, it looks like Glenn Beck was right when he said, We surround them!" she concluded, not providing another example in which 25 percent of a group "surrounds" the other three quarters.

Or, as Custer said to his troops, "Don't worry, men - we surround them!"

Date: 2010-04-16 04:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com
the geek and i have been discussing your perspicacity in this statistical matter.
do you think the tps get too much coverage?

Date: 2010-04-16 05:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] villagecharm.livejournal.com
Oh, definitely too much coverage. Especially because they aren't actually doing anything - wave a sign, draw a crowd of 400, make a speech. Super. But where are their candidates? Where - to use the 60s example - is their willingness to directly confront the institutions they consider corrupt/tyrannical? Where are their building occupations/wildcat strikes/sit-ins/boycotts/marches? All they do, as far as I can tell, is whine.

Date: 2010-04-16 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com
what drives the coverage (news judgment) in your shop? or do you think all demos/photo opportunity/soundbite politics of zero agency get the same coverage?

goebbels was all about the soundbite. i have to go back and read my fascist tomes. (and i wish i could confirm the internet rumor that mick jagger and david bowie have see Triumph of the Will 43 times.)

Date: 2010-04-16 04:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] villagecharm.livejournal.com
In my shop, I think local factors determine coverage. My old chums in West Virginia handled their Tea Party story with a brief not exceeding 130 words, for example. We gave them a full-length story because we wanted to write about how they've become an arm of the state (and, in particular, the Wake County) GOP, despite constant claims of nonpartisanship. Of the dozen office-seekers who spoke, all were Republicans, and they were joined by apparatchiks from the Wake County party. It seemed like a good chance to point out how this movement supposedly formed in opposition to politics-as-usual is becoming, in North Carolina at least, a get-out-the-vote drive for one of the Big Two.

But in general, I think the press is attracted by the chance for pictures of people acting crazy and quotes from people saying stupid things.

Date: 2010-04-16 04:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purejuice.livejournal.com
that's a good story, tp R us.

Profile

purejuice: (Default)
purejuice

January 2012

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 22nd, 2025 07:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios